Transforming Universities: National Conditions of Their Varied Organisational Actorhood
Identifieur interne : 000066 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000065; suivant : 000067Transforming Universities: National Conditions of Their Varied Organisational Actorhood
Auteurs : RBID : Francis:13-0111147Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Despite major changes in the governance of universities overtly intended to transform them into authoritatively integrated collectivities, the extent of their organisational actorhood remains quite limited and varied between OECD countries. This is because of inherent limitations to the managerial direction and control of research and teaching activities in public science systems as well as considerable variations in how governance changes are being implemented in different kinds of states. Four ideal types of university can be distinguished in terms of their strategic and operational autonomy and capability: Hollow, State-contracted, State-chartered and Private-portfolio. These become established under different proximate and background conditions such that relatively high levels of organisational actorhood are unlikely to be achieved in many OECD countries without major shifts in state structures and policies.
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Francis, to step Corpus: 000070
- to stream Francis, to step Curation: 000070
- to stream Francis, to step Checkpoint: 000066
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000066
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Transforming Universities: National Conditions of Their Varied Organisational Actorhood</title><author><name sortKey="Whitley, Richard" uniqKey="Whitley R">Richard Whitley</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Manchester Business School, University of Manchester</s1><s2>Manchester</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Manchester</settlement><region type="nation">Angleterre</region><region nuts="2" type="region">Grand Manchester</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Manchester</orgName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="inist">13-0111147</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 13-0111147 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Francis:13-0111147</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Corpus">000070</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Curation">000070</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Checkpoint">000066</idno><idno type="MainMerge">000066</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000066</idno></publicationStmt><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0026-4695</idno><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Minerva : (Lond.)</title><title level="j" type="main">Minerva : (London)</title></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Economic elite</term><term>Governance</term><term>Institutional actor</term><term>Labor Market</term><term>OECD</term><term>Organizational Change</term><term>State Intervention</term><term>University</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Changement organisationnel</term><term>Gouvernance</term><term>Université</term><term>Intervention de l'Etat</term><term>Elite économique</term><term>Marché du travail</term><term>OCDE</term><term>Acteur institutionnel</term><term>Administration publique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Gouvernance</term><term>Université</term><term>Marché du travail</term><term>Administration publique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Despite major changes in the governance of universities overtly intended to transform them into authoritatively integrated collectivities, the extent of their organisational actorhood remains quite limited and varied between OECD countries. This is because of inherent limitations to the managerial direction and control of research and teaching activities in public science systems as well as considerable variations in how governance changes are being implemented in different kinds of states. Four ideal types of university can be distinguished in terms of their strategic and operational autonomy and capability: Hollow, State-contracted, State-chartered and Private-portfolio. These become established under different proximate and background conditions such that relatively high levels of organisational actorhood are unlikely to be achieved in many OECD countries without major shifts in state structures and policies.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000066 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000066 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Linguistique
|area= CharterV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= Francis:13-0111147
|texte= Transforming Universities: National Conditions of Their Varied Organisational Actorhood
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07. |  |